Two recent, momentous announcements by the SEC grabbed the attention of SEC whistleblowers and the whistleblower law firm attorneys who represent them.
On September 28, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that it granted its 100th whistleblower award.
On October 22, 2020, the SEC announced that it granted a $114 million whistleblower award. This was the largest SEC whistleblower award granted to date.
In a statement about the 100th award, the SEC’s Chairman said:
Today’s award marks a milestone for the whistleblower program. This whistleblower is the 100th individual to receive an award under the program since its inception, and the 33rd individual awarded so far this year.
The pace and the amounts of the awards in recent years underscore the Commission’s commitment to increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the whistleblower program. We remain dedicated to working quickly to get more money into the hands of whistleblowers …
In an SEC press release about the record $114 million award, the Chairman stated:
Today’s milestone award is a testament to the Commission’s commitment to award whistleblowers who provide the agency with high-quality information … Whistleblowers make important contributions to the enforcement of securities laws and we are committed to getting more money to whistleblowers as quickly and efficiently as possible.
Why Some Whistleblower Law Firm Attorneys Have Concerns About The Timing Of These Two Awards
These two milestones represent truly landmark occasions for the SEC whistleblower program. Many SEC whistleblowers and SEC whistleblower lawyers rightly praised the Commission for its impressive accomplishments.
However, these two milestones have not been without controversy, with some whistleblower law firm attorneys questioning their timing.
Some whistleblower lawyers pointed out that the Commission announced the 100th award just five days after it voted to pass its controversial amendments to the SEC whistleblower rules.
Other whistleblower law firm lawyers noted that the Commission announced the $114 million award on October 22, 2020. In other words, just one day before the earliest possible effective date for the new amended rules. (The amendments actually became effective on December 7, 2020.)
The Abandoned “Cap” Rule
The concerns regarding the new amendments stretch back to when the Commission first proposed the amendments on June 28, 2018. Analyzing all of them exceeds the scope of this article, but the media widely covered one in particular.
That concern pertained to a proposal that many classified as a “cap” on SEC whistleblower rewards. Under that proposal, for cases in which the SEC collected more than $100 million, it could reduce a whistleblower’s award. The Commission could reduce the award to an amount that it deemed “reasonably necessary”. However, the reduced award still had to fall within the 10%-30% range required by the Dodd-Frank Act.
Whistleblowers and whistleblower law firm attorneys, and others, roundly criticized this proposal to “cap” SEC Whistleblower awards. So, too, did U.S. Senators from both the Republican and Democratic parties.
The final amendments to the SEC whistleblower rules dropped the “cap” rule.
Why Some Whistleblower Law Firm Attorneys Have Concerns About The New Amendments To The SEC Whistleblower Rules
Previously, SEC award orders predominantly quantified awards granted in terms of percentages of the overall amount collected in the case. However, in connection with the amendments, the Commission asserted its authority to issue awards denominated in dollar figures. The Commission called this a procedural clarification. Some lawyers wondered, though, whether it really represented a backdoor attempt to reintroduce a discretionary cap on awards.
At the risk of oversimplifying, the fear that those whistleblower law firm attorneys have is that the SEC could determine that a spectacular whistleblower meets the criteria for a maximum 30% award, but could then issue an award in a lower dollar amount without ever mentioning what percentage the whistleblower was originally found to be entitled to.
Given the original “cap” proposal, these fears do not lack basis. However, it has long been advisable for an SEC whistleblower attorney, or any attorney for that matter, to maintain their objectivity in order to provide the best advice they can to their clients. This involves refraining from becoming so emotionally involved in a particular matter or cause that the lawyer’s advice becomes impaired.
Keeping that in mind, it is worthwhile to examine this issue from the opposite perspective.
Issuing SEC Whistleblower Awards In Dollars
From the inception of the SEC whistleblower program, the Commission has determined award percentages in closed door hearings. Whistleblowers and their SEC whistleblower attorneys may submit written award applications for review during those closed door hearings. However, they do not have a right to attend those hearings.
Moreover, the Commission has the discretion to determine award amounts. The Commission does not use a mathematical formula to determine appropriate award percentages.
From a skeptical perspective, to date there has been nothing preventing the Commission from assigning even a superb whistleblower a percentage figure lower than the percentage that the whistleblower arguably deserved. No one outside of the Commission would likely ever know.
Therefore, if the SEC wants to deceptively “cap” large awards, it could already do that by manipulating the percentages. The Commission would not need to announce a new procedure about issuing awards in dollar amounts to do so.
The Timing Of The 100th SEC Whistleblower Award
Some whistleblower law firm attorneys posited that the announcement of the 100th SEC whistleblower award less than a week after approving the amended rules may have been an attempt to divert attention away from that vote. For several years, whistleblower law firm lawyers have been complaining about how long it takes for the Commission to grant awards. The Commission itself has acknowledged the lengthy delays and stated (or implied) its intention to try to find ways to speed up the award process.
The timing of the 100th award may have been fortuitous, but to criticize the SEC for issuing it (as opposed to sitting on it and not granting it, and backing up the other awards waiting in line to be issued behind it, for months longer) seems a bit inconsistent. In fact, in a little more than a month following that 100th award, the Commission granted ten more awards (as of November 3, 2020).
The Timing Of The $114MM SEC Whistleblower Award
Likewise, some SEC whistleblower attorneys questioned whether the SEC issued the record $114 million award the day before the new amended rules could have first gone into effect for public relations reasons. They reason that the Commission intended the announcement to deflect attention away from those new rules.
However, if the Commission intentionally timed this announcement, it may have done so to send a different message. The Commission recognizes the fear and controversy surrounding its abandoned “cap” rule. The announcement of this record award may have been the Commission’s way of trying to reassure everyone that it does not intend to artificially or unfairly cap large awards.
Who Is Correct?
So who has the correct view? Well, if you have faith in how the current SEC leadership is implementing its whistleblower program, you may be justified. The SEC did recently announce the record $114 million award. Moreover, during the 2020 fiscal year, the SEC gave out more individual whistleblower awards than in any prior year.
If you are skeptical or concerned, you, too, may be justified based on the recent rules amendments. In addition, the SEC did propose the “cap” rule, only dropping it after a vigorous and sustained public outcry.
Bear in mind, though, that when Presidential administrations change, the new President nominates a new SEC Chairman. Each of the SEC Commissioners serve defined terms of office. They then either resign or have to be reapproved for another term. Different SEC Chairmen, and different Commissioners, hold different views.
So if you feel concerned, remember that one Commission might do things one way. But that does not mean that a future Commission will do things the same way.
Some people like the recent changes; others remain skeptical. Either way, only time will tell how the Commission will implement them in practice. The amended rules and their related pronouncements are too new for there to be reliable data yet about how the Commission may go about applying them going forward.
For Part 2 of this article, please click here –>
For a more detailed memo about the 2020 SEC whistleblower amendments, please click here.
* * *
ABOUT THE PICKHOLZ LAW OFFICES LLC
The Pickholz Law Offices LLC focuses on representing clients involved with white collar, financial, securities, and related investigations conducted by government agencies and other regulatory authorities.
The Pickholz Law Offices represents employees, officers, and others in SEC whistleblower cases involving investment banks, broker dealers, financial institutions, and public companies listed in the Fortune Top 10, Top 20, Top 50, Top 100, Top 500, and the Forbes Global 2000. We were the first law firm ever to win an SEC whistleblower award for a client on appeal to the full Commission in Washington. Inside Counsel magazine named this achievement one of the five key events of the SEC whistleblower program. To see examples of the Firm’s SEC whistleblower cases please click here.
In addition to representing SEC whistleblowers, since 1995 the Firm’s founder, Jason R. Pickholz, has also represented many clients in white collar and securities enforcement investigations conducted by the SEC, CFTC, FINRA, the U.S. Department of Justice and US Attorney’s Offices, State authorities, and more. You can see examples of some of Mr. Pickholz’s many securities enforcement cases here.
To see actual clients’ statements about The Pickholz Law Offices, go to the Client Reviews page on our website or click here.
HOW TO CONTACT THE PICKHOLZ LAW OFFICES LLC
To speak with a securities lawyer or SEC whistleblower attorney, please feel free to call Jason R. Pickholz at 347-746-1222.
The Pickholz Law Offices remains open and fully operational through teleworking while we all grapple with this terrible pandemic. We hope that all of our clients, colleagues, friends, and their families remain safe and healthy, and our thoughts and prayers go out to everyone affected by COVID-19.
This publication should not be construed as providing legal advice. It should never be considered as a substitute for consulting with your own lawyer. The use of this publication and/or The Pickholz Law Offices LLC’s web site or web page that it is published on (the “web site”) does not constitute or create any attorney-client, fiduciary, or confidential relationship between The Pickholz Law Offices LLC and/or the owners/operators of The Pickholz Law Offices LLC’s web site, and anyone using this publication or web site or anyone else.
The information contained in this publication and/or on this web site is for informational purposes only. The content of this publication and/or this web site may not reflect current developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results of prior cases or matters contained in this publication or on this web site are not indicative of future results or outcomes, and should not be taken as a prediction, promise, or guarantee of any future result or outcome.
No one who accesses this publication and/or The Pickholz Law Offices LLC’s web site should act or refrain from acting based on anything contained therein. For additional terms and conditions governing the use of this publication and/or this web site, please click here or on the “disclaimer” link at the bottom of The Pickholz Law Offices LLC’s web site.