Skip to content
Blog

SEC Fines NY-NJ Port Authority For Not Disclosing Risks

As I was posting my article last week, the SEC announced that
it fined the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey for not
disclosing certain risks about its construction projects to
bond investors.  This follows another recent SEC case that
involved the City of Miami, Florida.  These cases are worth
noting for a potential
SEC whistleblower or
SEC whistleblower lawyer, because they show that the SEC is serious about bringing
cases for municipal securities violations.

The first municipal issuer to admit to securities violations: 
the Port Authority of NY and NJ

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (“Port
Authority”) builds, operates, and maintains certain
transportation and other facilities in New York and New
Jersey.  To help finance its projects, the Port Authority
sells public bonds.  It is one of the largest municipal
securities issuers in the country.

To finance certain “Roadway Projects” in New Jersey, the Port
Authority sold $2.3 billion worth of bonds.  To sell the
bonds, the Port Authority had to provide information to
potential investors in what was called an “Official
Statement”.  An Official Statement is similar to the corporate
prospectus that a company must provide in connection with a
public offering of its stock.

SEC to the port authority of NY and NJ

According to the SEC’s
Order
imposing sanctions, the Port Authority determined that it had
“no clear path to legislative authority to undertake” certain
of the projects.  Another internal memo referred to “the risk
of a successful challenge by the bondholders and investors.” 
The Port Authority did not disclose these facts or risks to
potential bond purchasers, in the Official Statements or
otherwise.

Among other things, the SEC’s Order required the Port
Authority to hire an independent consultant to review and
issue a report on the Port Authority’s policies and
procedures, adopt “all” recommendations in the independent
consultant’s report, and pay a $400,000 penalty.

Especially noteworthy is that the Order states that the Port
Authority “acknowledges that its conduct violated the federal
securities laws.”  In a
press release
about the case, the SEC noted:  “The Port Authority is the
first municipal issuer to admit wrongdoing in an SEC
enforcement action.”

The first federal jury trial against a municipality:  Miami

In 2013, the SEC brought a case in federal court against the
City of Miami, Florida for making false and misleading
statements and omissions in connection with three bond
offerings totaling $153.5 million.

SEC vs Miami

On September 14, 2016, the jury issued a verdict in favor of
the SEC and against Miami.

That same day, the Director of the SEC’s Division of
Enforcement issued a
public statement
in which he noted that this case was “the first federal jury
trial by the SEC against a municipality or one of its officers
for violations of the federal securities laws.”

He went on to add “We will continue to hold municipalities and
their officers accountable, including through trials, if they
engage in financial fraud or other conduct that violates the
federal securities laws.”

For a copy of the SEC’s court Complaint against Miami, see
here.  For a copy of the SEC’s press release about the case, see
here.

The SEC’s MCDC Initiative

A few years ago, the SEC began what it called its
“Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation Initiative”
or “MCDC”.  Under the MCDC Initiative, if municipal bond
underwriters, issuers, and others voluntarily self-reported
violations of the securities laws in their offering documents
to the SEC, they could receive better settlement terms or
lighter sanctions.

On August 24, 2016, the SEC
announced
that it brought enforcement cases against 71 municipal issuers
and others under the MCDC Initiative.

American Flag

That announcement brought the total number of cases that the
SEC had brought under its MCDC Initiative to 143, as of that
date.

At the end of the announcement is a list of parties whom the
SEC entered Orders against.  That list includes parties from
approximately 45 different States.

The MCDC Initiative, and the cases against the Port Authority
and Miami, show that the SEC has been and continues to take
municipal securities frauds and violations seriously.

For the SEC whistleblower and SEC whistleblower lawyer:  links
to other types of SEC cases

Municipal securities frauds and violations are just some of
the many kinds of cases that the SEC has jurisdiction over.

For instance, two weeks ago I wrote about a case that the SEC
brought in connection with an alleged pay-to-play fraud
involving a public pension fund, which you can read about
here.

Some examples of other kinds of cases that the SEC brings can
be found by following the links within that post.

* * *

About the Pickholz Law Offices LLC

The Pickholz Law Offices LLC is a law firm that focuses on
representing clients involved with investigations conducted by
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, FINRA, and other
securities regulators.

The Pickholz Law Offices has represented employees, officers,
and others in SEC whistleblower cases involving financial
institutions and public companies listed in the Fortune Top
10, Top 20, Top 50, Top 100, Top 500, and the Forbes Global
2000. We were the first law firm ever to win an SEC
whistleblower award for a client on appeal to the full
Commission in Washington. Inside Counsel magazine named this
achievement one of the five key events of the SEC
whistleblower program. Examples of the
Firm’s SEC whistleblower cases are available here.

In addition to representing SEC whistleblowers, since 1995 the
Firm’s founder, Jason R. Pickholz, has also represented many
clients in securities enforcement investigations conducted by
the SEC, FINRA, the U.S. Department of Justice and US
Attorney’s Offices, State authorities, and more. Examples of
some of the many
securities enforcement cases that Mr. Pickholz has been
involved with are available here
.

You can see what actual clients have had to say about The
Pickholz Law Offices by going to the
Client Reviews page on our website or by clicking here.

How to Contact the Pickholz Law Offices LLC

If you would like to speak with a securities lawyer or SEC
whistleblower attorney, please feel free to call Jason R.
Pickholz at 347-746-1222.

The Pickholz Law Offices remains open and will be fully
operational through teleworking while we all grapple with this
terrible pandemic. We hope that all of our clients,
colleagues, friends, and their families remain safe and
healthy. Our thoughts and prayers go out to everyone who has
been affected by COVID-19.


pickholz-law-logo-600x129
Jason Pickholz - pickholzlaw.com

The Pickholz Law Offices represents U.S. and international clients in securities and white collar cases. The Firm has helped whistleblowers report frauds to the SEC, CFTC, and IRS, and has defended clients in investigations by the SEC, CFTC, DOJ, FINRA, and other financial and securities enforcement regulators.

The Firm’s founder, Jason Pickholz, is the author of the two-volume book Securities Crimes, has appeared on tv and radio, and has taught continuing legal education courses. A former BigLaw partner, he has been representing clients in financial and securities fraud cases since 1995. In recognition of his many achievements, Mr. Pickholz was elected by his legal peers to be a Fellow of The New York Bar Foundation, an honor limited to just 1% of all attorneys in the New York State Bar Association.

Mr. Pickholz has been counsel in many high-profile cases. He was the first attorney ever to win an SEC whistleblower award on appeal to the Commission, which Inside Counsel magazine called one of the five key events in the history of the SEC whistleblower program. On the defense side, Mr. Pickholz has defended clients in the SEC’s COVID-19 investigations, the CFTC’s cryptocurrency cases, and a former US Senator, among others.

If you want to speak with a CFTC, IRS, or SEC whistleblower lawyer, or with a white collar defense lawyer, you can call the Firm at 347-746-1222.

The above information is not and should not be construed as providing legal advice. It is not and should never be considered as a substitute for consulting with your own lawyer. The use of this web site or this page does not constitute or create any attorney-client, fiduciary, or confidential relationship between The Pickholz Law Offices LLC and anyone using this web site, or anyone else. The information contained on this website is for informational purposes only. The content of this web site may not reflect current developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results of prior cases or matters contained on this web site are not indicative of future results or outcomes, and should not be taken as a prediction, promise, or guarantee of any future result or outcome. No one who accesses this web site should act or refrain from acting based on anything contained on this web site. For additional terms-of-use and conditions governing the use of this web site, please view our full Terms and Conditions.