As an SEC whistleblower lawyer, prospective clients often ask me whether terms in their companies’ severance agreements or confidentiality agreements prevent them from reporting frauds to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  According to the SEC, the answer is “no”.

The SEC has been vigorously pursuing companies that put clauses in agreements designed to chill employees from blowing the whistle.  Just yesterday, the SEC brought its fourth case in five months against a company for trying to do this.

Cases Discussed In My Prior SEC Whistleblower Lawyer Posts

In September, the SEC imposed sanctions on Anheuser-Busch for using severance agreements that attempted to chill former employees from providing information to the SEC.  The agreement contained a liquidated damages clause.  That clause required the former employee to pay $250,000 to the company for a breach of the severance agreement.  One former employee who was working with the SEC actually stopped blowing the whistle out of fear of this provision in the severance agreement.

The SEC said that the severance agreement violated SEC Rule 21F-17(a).  Among other things, the SEC forced the company to pay more than $6 million in disgorgement, penalties, and interest for both its severance agreements and the substantive violations it committed.

In August, the SEC punished two companies for putting terms in their separation agreements to chill their former employees from reporting to the SEC.  Those companies were Health Net and BlueLinx.

The terms in both companies’ agreements required departing employees to waive their rights to receive SEC whistleblower awards.  Among other things, the SEC imposed a penalty of $340,000 on Health Net.  It imposed a penalty of $265,000 on BlueLinx.

Last year, the SEC punished KBR for imposing confidentiality agreements on its employees that prevented them from telling the SEC about the substance of internal interviews.  The SEC fined KBR $130,000, among other things.

NeuStar: The SEC Isn’t Fooled By A Twist

NeuStar’s severance agreements had a different twist than the ones in the cases discussed above.  NeuStar put a “Nondisparagement” clause in its severance agreements.

The clause said that employees could not have any communication that “disparages, denigrates, maligns or impugns NeuStar or its officers, directors” and a whole host of other people.  It then had a big list of people and entities who the employee could not have such communications with.  That list referred to regulators “including but not limited to the Securities and Exchange Commission”.

If the employee breached that clause, he or she would forfeit all but $100 of any severance compensation that he/she had been paid.

The SEC did not find any evidence that NeuStar tried to enforce the Nondisparagement clause.  But it did find that at least one former employee “was impeded by the Nondisparagement Clause from communicating with the Commission”.

In an Order dated yesterday, the SEC whistleblower lawyerSEC imposed sanctions against NeuStar.  Among other things, the Order imposed a $180,000 penalty against NeuStar.

Comments by SEC Officials on NeuStar

The SEC also issued a press release about the NeuStar case yesterday.  It contains comments that may be of interest, whether you are an SEC whistleblower or SEC whistleblower lawyer.

The press release quotes the Associate Director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division as stating: “Public companies cannot use severance agreements to impede whistleblowers from communicating with the SEC about a possible securities law violation”.

Also in the press release, the Chief of the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower expressed “our ongoing commitment to ensuring that potential whistleblowers can freely communicate with the SEC about possible securities law violations.”

*      *     *

As an SEC whistleblower law firm, The Pickholz Law Offices has represented employees, officers, and others in SEC whistleblower cases involving financial institutions and public companies listed in the Fortune Top 10, Top 20, Top 50, Top 100, Top 500, and the Forbes Global 2000.  We were the first law firm ever to win an SEC whistleblower award for a client on appeal to the full Commission in Washington, an achievement that Inside Counsel magazine named one of the five milestones of the SEC whistleblower program.

For more information about The Pickholz Law Offices, you can click on any of the links in the margins of this page.

If you would like to speak with an SEC whistleblower attorney, please feel free to call Jason R. Pickholz at 347-746-1222.

 

 

 

The above information is not and should not be construed as providing legal advice.  It is not and should never be considered as a substitute for consulting with your own attorney.  The use of this web site or this page does not constitute or create any attorney-client, fiduciary, or confidential relationship between The Pickholz Law Offices LLC and anyone using this web site, or anyone else.  The information contained on this website is for informational purposes only.  The content of this web site may not reflect current developments.  Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.  Results of prior cases or matters contained on this web site are not indicative of future results or outcomes, and should not be taken as a prediction, promise, or guarantee of any future result or outcome.  No one who accesses this web site should act or refrain from acting based on anything contained on this web site.  For additional terms and conditions governing the use of this web site, please click on the “disclaimer” link at the bottom of this page or click here.